Uh... you did see the name of the GNU LGPL, right? Notice "GNU"? It was written by the FSF for the GNU Project. It's a free software license. It's the GNU GPL, but with the copyleft restrictions weakened for strategic purposes. It makes no sense for PiTiVi or any other program that isn't a library to use the LGPL, but using the LGPL in a place where it doesn't make sense doesn't mean the project is "weak" or "open source".

Ironically, you pioneered OpenShot, the most well-known free video editor that markets itself as "open source" (look at the name!) in the same post where you said something about projects described as "open source" being weak...

Reply via email to