В 15:20 +0100 на 01.03.2014 (сб), mikko.viinamaki[@nospam] написа:
> I wonder wouldn't a centralized way be better? I think this is what the Software Freedom Conservancy does (for donations?). [1] See the list of member projects. [2] > It would be easier to promote one fundraiser. A centralized fundraiser has one disadvantage. It is not clear how the funds should be divided and between which projects. One option would be to choose which project should benefit during the contribution submission. I think the FSF had an option to choose if a donation is for specific project or cause, or one that they decide how to use best. > Like say FSF would do a huge annual fundraiser and then publicly distribute > the funds. The FSF helps mainly official GNU projects. The two main reasons are: * they have limited staff * for GNU projects there are requirements, which guaranties that the project will stay free software, follow other useful guidelines and behave well towards its users. [1] https://sfconservancy.org/ [2] https://sfconservancy.org/members/current/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
