I really agree with greenman, though I don't know how sensible it is to state
criticism here.
In fact, it's rubens project and if he wants to stick with the current state,
then so it will be.
Trisquel is right on top of my list of distros with great potential, but it
will remain on my experimental pc's until there is a big change in
development structure.
I really don't understand many things... if ruben is lacking time, why not
drop such tasks like "implement tor features in icecat"? There is the tor
browser bundle, so why bothering with something like this while security
updates are drying out?
Why giving speeches nobody ever hears?
And i like the design of trisquel, but I could live with standard
gnome-fallback if this creates more space for frequent security updates.
I know some one man-projects when it comes to software.
Normally, the developer is the most active and reachable member of the board.
Maybe I had already become a member if there weren't those doubts... well,
let's see what future brings.
Basically, trisquel is just ubuntu with removed packages and a pimped
gnome-fallback.
I'm not underestimating this - clearly it's quite a task -, but let's not
forget this when talking about workload.
