As to the rudeness, as I've subsequently blogged this is as much down to their folly in shipping a device containing free software and not thinking members of the free software community would contact them with patch reports - which is essentially what I did here. Their fault of course.
Thanks for the thanks. I would normally stick with the keep it confidential
nature of proper security practice but I made a personal decision to break
with that based on the balance of a number of factors in this case.
- [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-3780 Home Broad... Andrew Lindley
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-3780 H... martin . racak
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-37... andrew
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-3780 H... dhfubq3oq
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-37... Andrew Lindley
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-3780 H... milind727
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-37... Andrew Lindley
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-3780 H... arielxgbarton
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DSL-37... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Link DS... arielxgbarton
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Backdoor ids in D-Lin... Andrew Lindley
