Anyway, I guess PRISM Break is mostly positive: many users seeking to harden the work of the national intelligence agencies have certainly found some answers in the (mostly) free software list that the sites recommends.
Forget about Fedora and look at openSUSE: this distribution with quite a lot
of proprietary software (not only in the kernel) is edited by Novell, which
is Microsoft's number 1 partner in the GNU/Linux world (since 2006)... and
Microsoft is PRISM's oldest partner of the NSA (since 2007). How can PRISM
Break recommend openSUSE and not Trisquel because it has (entirely
transparent because free software only) links with Ubuntu? That makes no
sense.
- [Trisquel-users] is trisquel not worth to mention in pri... toni . schultheis
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: is trisquel not worth to ... dns
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is trisquel not worth to m... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Re : is trisquel not worth... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is trisquel not worth to menti... Andrew Lindley
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is trisquel not worth to menti... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ***SPAM*** Re: is trisquel... Adfeno Huvlov
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: is trisquel not worth to ... dns
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: is trisquel not worth to ... toni . schultheis
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is trisquel not worth to menti... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Antwort: is trisquel not worth to ... toni . schultheis
- Re: [Trisquel-users] is trisquel not worth to menti... toni . schultheis