And the GPL often is a good choice for libraries: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html
The reason for the core to be permissively licensed is to keep having
proprietary software around. Like additional libraries that (potentially free
software) applications will use (making them impossible to run in freedom). I
see nothing positive in that.
- [Trisquel-users] .NET Core is open source gromobir
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .NET Core is open source tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Re : .NET Core is open sour... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .NET Core is open s... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Re : .NET Core is o... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .NET Core ... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .NET C... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .N... tegskywalker
- [Trisquel-users] Beware patent traps -- Microsof... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Beware patent traps -- ... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Beware patent traps -- ... J.B. Nicholson-Owens
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .NET Core is open sourc... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] .NET Core is open s... tegskywalker
