Thanks for the correction/info. Interesting interpretation of events/read.
You might be right. That's not what I recall being told by one of the
developers and not having read the policies personally... could be wrong....
From a quick skim and what I recall it seems like there is/was some confusion
about how things should be done and the policies in relation to the packaging
of free firmware within Debian. Or maybe these policies have changed. It's
been a while since I talked to anybody about this.
- [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? 77xzssxz5l
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? Tiberiu C. Turbureanu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? 77xzssxz5l
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? legimet . calc
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free? chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] ath9k not free... davesamcdxv
