25-11-2014 02:18:50 [email protected]:
> I think there are a lot of people in the free software 
community with
> objections with the claims being made. My hands aren't 
tied like some so
> I'll point out some of the other issues.
> 
> 1. There have been numerous efforts to free laptops in the 
past with some
> successes. It's not for a lack of trying that ThinkPenguin's 
not succeed.
> Resolving all the issues with modern X86 systems is a 
near impossible feat.
> We've made some effort in this department, but it's more 
of a token gesture
> and the laptops would only be a little bit better. If you 
refurbish an older
> laptop it is easier.
> 
> 2. License violations and a lack of understanding about 
what free software
> is. If something needs a binary blob it's not free software. 
I'd never try
> to make that claim. At best I'd describe our laptops as 
being free software
> friendly at an OS level. That is everything is going to work 
with free
> software distributions even though there are unfortunately 
non-free pieces
> critical to all modern laptops (BIOS, micro-code, and 
similar firmware).
> 
> 3. NVIDIA is not cooperative so the support for the 
graphics using the
> reverse engineered nouveau driver is years behind- it 
simply isn't possible
> to get half-way decent support for the GT840M graphics 
in this system at
> this time. Of the people who have tried I know there were 
major issues and
> no successes as far as I've heard. Evidence on how Todd 
achieved some level
> of success in getting this to work would be a first step, 
but it still
> isn't a good design choice from a free software angle. 
Even if you succeed
> it's not going to work well enough to claim support and so 
including it at
> all is disingenuous. People will buy with certain 
expectations-
> expectations that Todd can't possibly meet.
> 
> 4. Intel's not cooperative on the coreboot front. Why 
would you even think
> that they'd cooperate now? Google tried to get them to 
release code for the
> Chromebook. They refused. The coreboot developer have 
been begging for Intel
> to cooperate for years. $250,000 USD isn't going to cut it 
when millions
> are already been poured into the effort. Intel does 
cooperate on the
> graphics front though. There simply is no perfect or even 
good solution to
> these problems.
> 
> 5. "Designed" and “manufacturer” are interesting choice 
of words. Todd
> makes it sound like he actually designed a new board for 
this. There are few
> actual “manufacturers” or companies designing pretty 
much anything. Major
> companies usually utilize one of a handful of companies 
specialized in the
> given arena to design and/or manufacture. Components 
are usually designed
> by one of a few big companies valued at billions of dollars 
(Intel,
> Broadcom, Atheros, etc, not Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc). I'm 
not questioning his
> intention to design a product or support the product. 
That's fair game.
> Everybody does it. However I think his choice of wording 
gets dangerously
> close to fraud. It is misleading territory at a minimum. If he 
was to
> become a manufacturer he would need a lot more than 
$250,000 USD. He should
> focus on the overall product design rather than claiming to 
have designed
> or manufactured something uniquely new- for which 
simply isn't likely in
> this context.
> 
> 6. I'm pretty confident Todd didn't talk to the FSF as 
stated. Comments made
> elsewhere by people in the know implied the project was 
unknown to the FSF
> until after it had been announced.
> 
> I have some background knowledge of this laptop. It's 
designed by a Chinese
> company with ties to the Chinese government. It is 
actually a clone of
> Apple's product lineup and a poor machine to build a free 
software product
> off. In China you can get these machines from shady 
backstreet vendors with
> the actual Apple logo. You can actually see just how 
rampant trademark
> infringement is here:
> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-07/20/fake-apple-stores. These
> systems are flat out unsafe. These machines are of 
extremely poor quality.
> I've actually “seen” other similar models get seized on 
import. It won't
> happen every time as the US doesn't have many enforcers 
at the border
> scanning for shipments of infringing or illegal product, but 
it does happen.
> 
> I do think we need a campaign like this, but we should 
work with one of the
> manufacturers whose got someI think there are a lot of 
people in the free
> software community with objections with the claims being 
made. My hands
> aren't tied like some so I'll point out some of the other 
issues.
> 
> 1. There have been numerous efforts to free laptops in the 
past with some
> successes. It's not for a lack of trying that ThinkPenguin's 
not succeed.
> Resolving all the issues with modern X86 systems is a 
near impossible feat.
> We've made some effort in this department, but it's more 
of a token gesture
> and the laptops would only be a little bit better. If you 
refurbish an older
> laptop it is easier.
> 
> 2. License violations and a lack of understanding about 
what free software
> is. If something needs a binary blob it's not free software. 
I'd never try
> to make that claim. At best I'd describe our laptops as 
being free software
> friendly at an OS level. That is everything is going to work 
with free
> software distributions even though there are unfortunately 
non-free pieces
> critical to all modern laptops (BIOS, micro-code, and 
similar firmware).
> 
> 3. NVIDIA is not cooperative so the support for the 
graphics using the
> reverse engineered nouveau driver is years behind- it 
simply isn't possible
> to get half-way decent support for the GT840M graphics 
in this system at
> this time. Of the people who have tried I know there were 
major issues and
> no successes as far as I've heard. Evidence on how Todd 
achieved some level
> of success in getting this to work would be a first step, 
but it still
> isn't a good design choice from a free software angle. 
Even if you succeed
> it's not going to work well enough to claim support and so 
including it at
> all is disingenuous. People will buy with certain 
expectations-
> expectations that Todd can't possibly meet.
> 
> 4. Intel's not cooperative on the coreboot front. Why 
would you even think
> that they'd cooperate now? Google tried to get them to 
release code for the
> Chromebook. They refused. The coreboot developer have 
been begging for Intel
> to cooperate for years. $250,000 USD isn't going to cut it 
when millions
> are already been poured into the effort. Intel does 
cooperate on the
> graphics front though. There simply is no perfect or even 
good solution to
> these problems.
> 
> 5. "Designed" and “manufacturer” are interesting choice 
of words. Todd
> makes it sound like he actually designed a new board for 
this. There are few
> actual “manufacturers” or companies designing pretty 
much anything. Major
> companies usually utilize one of a handful of companies 
specialized in the
> given arena to design and/or manufacture. Components 
are usually designed
> by one of a few big companies valued at billions of dollars 
(Intel,
> Broadcom, Atheros, etc, not Dell, HP, Lenovo, etc). I'm 
not questioning his
> intention to design a product or support the product. 
That's fair game.
> Everybody does it. However I think his choice of wording 
gets dangerously
> close to fraud. It is misleading territory at a minimum. If he 
was to
> become a manufacturer he would need a lot more than 
$250,000 USD. He should
> focus on the overall product design rather than claiming to 
have designed
> or manufactured something uniquely new- for which 
simply isn't likely in
> this context.
> 
> 6. I'm pretty confident Todd didn't talk to the FSF as 
stated. Comments made
> elsewhere by people in the know implied the project was 
unknown to the FSF
> until after it had been announced.
> 
> I have some background knowledge of this laptop. It's 
designed by a Chinese
> company with ties to the Chinese government. It is 
actually a clone of
> Apple's product lineup and a poor machine to build a free 
software product
> off. In China you can get these machines from shady 
backstreet vendors with
> the actual Apple logo. You can actually see just how 
rampant trademark
> infringement is here:
> http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-07/20/fake-apple-stores. These
> systems are flat out unsafe. These machines are of 
extremely poor quality.
> I've actually “seen” other similar models get seized on 
import. It won't
> happen every time as the US doesn't have many enforcers 
at the border
> scanning for shipments of infringing or illegal product, but 
it does happen.
> 
> I do think we need a campaign like this, but we should 
work with one of the
> manufacturers whose got something we can actually build 
a free laptop from.
> I've talked with others about non-x86 hardware that might 
work and dollar
> amounts that are similar to what Todds trying to raise.
> 
> It'll be a tragedy if Todd's successful because there is real 
non-x86
> hardware that could potentially be totally freed. It will take 
$250,000+ to
> pull off the manufacture of the laptops (or sourcing of 
them anyway),
> developers (to port a distribution), and resources (time 
and energy to free
> it). Unfortunately ThinkPenguin's got other projects on the 
table right now
> and this is something that really needs a strong focus of 
time, cooperation,
> and resources to pull off. Todd has the time, but should 
have worked with
> the FSF on this and done it right.
> 
> thing we can actually build a free laptop from. I've talked 
with others
> about non-x86 hardware that might work and dollar 
amounts that are similar
> to what Todds trying to raise.
> 
> It'll be a tragedy if Todd's successful because there is real 
non-x86
> hardware that could potentially be totally freed. It will take 
$250,000+ to
> pull off the manufacture of the laptops (or sourcing of 
them anyway),
> developers (to port a distribution), and resources (time 
and energy to free
> it). Unfortunately ThinkPenguin's got other projects on the 
table right now
> and this is something that really needs a strong focus of 
time, cooperation,
> and resources to pull off. Todd has the time, but should 
have worked with
> the FSF on this and done it right.

+1


Best regards, ADFENO.
Have a nice day.



-- 
Assinatura automática – português brasileiro:
– Blogue: http://adfeno.wordpress.com/
– Favor não enviar-me documentos do Microsoft Office ou 
Apple 
iWork. Ao invés disso, envie documentos em 
OpenDocument! 
http://fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument/
– Se eu não te desejar um bom dia em meus e-mails, minhas 
postagens, ou meus comentários; isto significa que estes 
foram 
enviados por terceiros.

Automatic signature – North American English:
– Blog: http://adfeno.wordpress.com/
– Please do not send me Microsoft Office or Apple iWork 
documents. Instead, send OpenDocument documents! 
http://fsf.org/campaigns/opendocument/
– If I don't wish you a nice day in my emails, my posts, or 
my 
comments; this means that these were sent by third parties.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to