As long as Ubuntu does not alter upstream free software packages (i.e., in provenance from Debian testing) in ways that disrespect the "Free System Distribution Guidelines" (by adding, for instance, recommendation for proprietary software), I do not think Shuttleworth's policies can do Trisquel any harm.
"Shuttleworth's admitted dictatorial attitude, that the direction of the
Distro will be his decision" (quoting you) has an influence on Ubuntu's
default install and on software developed by Canonical (Unity, Mir, etc.).
Trisquel does not need to use the software developed by Canonical (Unity is
not Trisquel's default desktop for instance) and, as I wrote before, Ubuntu's
default install does *not* influence Trisquel. Trisquel only copies free
software (nothing is "hidden") packages from Ubuntu's repositories. If it
becomes impossible to copy the Unity packages (for instance) without copying
malware, then Trisquel will not copy those packages.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Here's the WebM for Ruben's interview on LA... taiji_tao
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Here's the WebM for Ruben's interview... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Here's the WebM for Ruben's interv... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Here's the WebM for Ruben's interv... taiji_tao
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Here's the WebM for Ruben's i... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Here's the WebM for Ruben's interview on LA... dooleyn
