The CC-BY is the most permissive of Creative Common license series (And it's
version 3.0 in this case). It's the first time that I open this web site, and
I didn't make an exhaustive or conclusive research, but at a glance, it seems
the site just puts the option to get a “commercial” license
automatically, without taking into account that in this case, the license
doesn't limits commercial usage of the work. Maybe when designing the web
site, the developers assumed that all licenses would limit commercial usage
and that the Copyright holder will always be interested in licensing
commercial usage; clearly that is not the case. If they also do this for
Copyleft licenses, then they would be spreading the mistake of confusing the
freedom of works with whether they allow commercial usage, which is a common
misconception; the GNU project has an essay on this.
- [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get about jamend... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get abo... nicolasrpmaia
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get abo... gramex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get abo... marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get abo... geomaticasocial
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't... geomaticasocial
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Something I don't ge... calinou
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get abo... shiretoko
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Something I don't get... marioxcc . MT
