But that approach has its drawbacks: by packaging all dependencies with the user application the same libraries (possibly in different versions, including insecure ones) are loaded several times into main memory, i.e., you end up with higher memory requirements.
Windows too. And Canonical is pushing something with the same advantages (but
more secure and with delta updates) into Ubuntu:
http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/tools/snappy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can be? greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can be? marioxcc . MT
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can be? abhijithb21
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can be? davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can be? jabjabs
- [Trisquel-users] Re : How inconvenient freedom can ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can b... davesamcdxv
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How inconvenient freedom can be? nicolasmaia
