We already covered the topic of a desktop environments and other software
depending on systemd, such as GNOME, which seems like the main argument of
this text? It would be much more useful if you add to the undergoing
discussion rather than start it all over again.
> In return for all of this ridiculousness, you get literally nothing. It has
zero advantages over its modern alternatives, all of which are actually
unix-like and modular.
So for example, systemd features like the use of cgroups are of no real use
(zero advantages) compared to the methods of other modern init systems? Can
you elaborate on that?
