I think it's ridiculous that the FCC would require certain hardware to be defective by design; if some modifications can cause a problem, those behaviors themselves should be made illegal, and the only thing vendors should be required to do, maybe, is inform consumers that those behaviors are illegal. Still, it looks to me like the fear of alternative operating systems being forbidden might be unjustified.
To be honest, I'm inclined to expect this to be the case... I mean, the "new"
rule in question is actually a year old (even though devices can still be
sold under the old rules for another year, if I read the page correctly), so
if freedom-respecting firmware is forbidden because of it, why hasn't the FSF
or EFF said anything about it?
- [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors ... lord_abinadi
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router... tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router... davidvargas1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi ro... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wif... chaosesqueteam
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force... davidvargas1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wif... davidvargas1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi ro... chris
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wif... chaosesqueteam
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wif... chaosesqueteam
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wif... davidvargas1
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wif... matt . ivie
- Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router... amenex
