People using free software would be locked out until/unless someone found a way to view the image with free software. At that point, you're right: The people with the free program are essentially breaking the DRM because they have full control of the image at that point. That's when the evil people come along and issue a DMCA take down notice to the hosting facility.
If a picture were DRMed, it could only viewed with a proprietary program.
That proprietary program would probably be running on a proprietary operating
system. Because you can only impose DRM with proprietary software. This then
gives the developer of that program the possibility to control various things
like not allowing screenshots or other methods.
- [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG format in the fut... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG format i... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG format i... tomlukeywood
- Re: [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG form... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG ... dennisjdufrene
- Re: [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG ... dennisjdufrene
- Re: [Trisquel-users] DRM may be added to JPEG format i... freeworld4
