Re: [Trisquel-users] Why do some old kernels still stay?

[rhutter]

To make my point clearer: I understand it's good to keep an older kernel, and  
it's ok to delete the even older ones by command line, if there's one single  
command that really does all the work. But why has dist-upgrade deleted  
kernel 66 (and probably others), but not 65 and 63 as well?