Basically, I wrote about the need to get representatives per country and also per state of a country, and the need to make the inactive ones more active. There is also need for a global community communication and interaction (but the main challenge is actually the language used, for which the Esperanto language can perhaps solve this issue, since it's easier to learn, and some countries like Brazil have a non-mandatory provision for high school to teach it if the school receives enough demand for it, which I think could be mandatory instead of based on demand).

Also there is the "fork and forget" kind of attitude. It's acceptable to have this kind of attitude when something isn't really in the goals of the original project, but for translations, localized forums and mods, things can stay in the same place. Example: The MinetestBrasil.com community was divided from the Minetest.net community just because a Brazilian Portuguese forum wasn't made there, or because of the language boundaries.

Reply via email to