As far as my experiences with QEMU/KVM, I find it to work a bit better than Virtualbox, but there is a steeper learning curve. It's worth it though, QEMU/KVM can do a lot of cool things and it's getting better all the time.
I also will recommend QEMU/KVM. It is a little trickier to use than
Virtualbox (At least if you are going to try using the command line).
Virt-Manager as recommended earlier is the easiest and most feature rich GUI
available for QEMU/KVM. Gnome Boxes also works, but you won't be able to do
much in terms of configuration. One thing to point out is to make sure when
using KVM to use the virtio driver for the disk and network if possible. The
virtio driver will speed up I/O tremendously.
- [Trisquel-users] why has no one made a fork of virtualbox... calmstorm
- [Trisquel-users] Re : why has no one made a fork of ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] why has no one made a fork of v... noordinaryspider
- Re: [Trisquel-users] why has no one made a fork of v... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] why has no one made a fork of v... codyhofstetter
- Re: [Trisquel-users] why has no one made a fork of v... pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] why has no one made a fork of v... kjagustafson
