> According to the copyfarleft movement, the licenses which follow this
movement must allow commercial redistribution [only if the redistributor is a
company or collective "owned by workers", in the other cases, the commercial
redistribution must be forbidden][2].
That is not libre software, and it is not acceptable.
Even if you agree with their political agenda, not everyone does. And if you
can restrict someone else's freedom to further your political agenda, others
can do it, too. Suppose a program is under a license that allows commercial
redistribution "only if the redistributor is not a Jew". The justification
for this would be no worse than the justification of "copyfarleft".
