I find it curious a piece of software has a section related to dispelling
"the biggest myths". I guess they've at least failed at explaining what their
stuff does.
Besides that it reminds of the classic Micro$oft "Get the Facts" campaign
which among its other merits claimed that
* Windows has lower total cost of ownership (TCO) than [GNU/]Linux. It turned
out that they were comparing [GNU/]Linux on a very expensive IBM Mainframe to
Windows on a PC!
* the .NET trading platform that it had developed in partnership with
Accenture for the London Stock Exchange, claiming that it provided "five
nines" reliability. After suffering extended downtime and unreliability the
LSE announced in 2009 that it was planning to drop its Microsoft solution and
switch to a [GNU/]Linux-based one in 2010.
