I disagree.
The free software movement is attached to the users' freedoms. Not to the
software. Its license is fundamental though: it must respect the four
essential freedoms of the users. The way the program was developed does not
matter at all.
On the contrary, the open source movement is attached to a development method
(transparency, peer reviewing, etc.), which is supposed to generate software
that is technically better. If not, open source proponents use proprietary
software. The license of the software is not as fundamental to them: the open
source movement criticizes free software whose development is done behind
closed doors.
Like onpon4 wrote above, that basically is the difference between "free
software" and "open source": A difference in the values that are defended,
hence a fundamental difference.
- [Trisquel-users] Re : I've probably misunderstood the difference b... lcerf
-