"The GNU GPL has no substantive requirements about what you do in private; the GPL conditions apply when you make the work available to others"
Removing ZFS packages entirely from the Trisquel repository would be taking
it to the extreme as it is a FLOSS package after all. If a user chooses to
manually install it, there should be nothing stopping them. It would be
private use as defined by RMS via the "Privately, You Can Do As You Like"
section at https://www.fsf.org/licensing/zfs-and-linux
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Canonical merges GPL-incompatible kernel... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Canonical merges GPL-incompatible k... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Canonical merges GPL-incompatible k... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Canonical merges GPL-incompatible k... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Canonical merges GPL-incompatible k... tegskywalker
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Canonical merges GPL-incompatible k... jason
