Well, that's the thing. Is it Pyra's objective freedom? At lest in the past
it didn't seem like it. Is it now?
I don't know if Novena's objective is it, but I kind of remember that it also
have some issues with some drivers needed, or the bios, I just can't recall.
I know we don't need to look for perfection and we should try to support
those who are trying and looking for better. What I can't understand is why
do those projects are not listed as viable options by the FSF. Look I do not
worship or follow blindly the FSF, everybody should make their own mind about
this kind of issues, but the FSF dedicates its existence to tackle them and I
believe it's a good source to make your own opinion.
Why is it that the FSF openly supports replicant and other projects and not
Novena and Pyra? There for is the reason I thought that supporting replicant
can be consider first before Novena and Pyra. It may just be a different of
opinion, I just want to hear others about it and make my own stand as well.
