Whether proprietary add-ons are built into the same package(s), as in
MacOSX/BSD, or built as separate packages as in Android/Linux (thus "on top")
to avoid triggering copyleft, the negative outcome for the software freedom
of users is exactly the same. If that's so, then there's no logical basis to
the claim that copyleft licenses prevents re-use in freedom-denying systems
more effectively than non-copyleft licenses do. In order to continue this
discussion with you, I need you to explain either how Android/Linux) is less
freedom-denying than MacOSX/BSD. If you can't do that, then I rest my case.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information about lo... jabjabs
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information abo... strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information abo... t8mf4nu6lizp
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information abo... svhaab
- Re: [Trisquel-users] will you distribute information abo... strypey
