If Google is donating money to the FSF without strings attached, then one needs to decide whether to accept tainted money. Recipients cannot help being influenced by their donors, and to think otherwise is quixotic.

If, however, the money is a payment from Google for FSF's allowing it to embed its tracking links in FSF's web pages, then shame on the FSF for allowing Google to spy upon the FSF's patrons.

Can anyone tell me which is the case?

Paul

Reply via email to