>You had a non free answer to the questioner.
I have no idea what you mean by this. I don't understand you.
>You wanted to give him the answer. You know it breaks the rules. You tried
to circumvent by a not recommendation statement. Right? I think he should
somehow get the answer you wanted to tell him. When people did not criticize
you, it is probably because you have a name on the forum. But you nor
thinkpenguin or anybody else should differ from forum rules. My question is,
would it comply with forum rules if answers about non free software are
messaged to the questioner?
Again, I don't understand what you're talking about.
>You should mention thinkpenguin every time a post is about getting hardware.
How do you think a questioner reacts if the only answer he gets is, get rid
of your hardware?
Why should I mention thinkpenguin? Why not the librebooted laptops libiquty
and minifree sells?
My first answer to the OP was to sell his laptop and buy one with an Intel
GPU.
Op answered to my first answer explaining he can not sell nor buy anything.
So I answered again because it seems better to me to have Debian with one
nonfree package than installing the Ubuntu Crapos which by the way is full of
proprietary software and freedom wise certainly 10 time worse than Debian.
And again, notice that my second answer contained not one but two warnings on
the peril of installing the non-free firmware.
I think you have some troubles with the language. If not, I really can't
understand what is the fuss.
