This has nothing to do with how thorough your explanation was. It was incorrect, and that's all I pointed out. If our positions were reversed, I wouldn't have responded to the correction, or if I did, my response would have been something to the effect of "yeah, I guess I was being a bit lazy there by describing it as 'for ints'". I don't understand why you are acting so angry.
> Your initial comment was also not a thorough explanation. If I were to call
it incorrect you would be acting the same way.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I ... onpon4
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I go about updating... mnaus
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I go about updating... jbar
- Re: [Trisquel-users] hey, how would I go about updating to the l... calmstorm
