> Perhaps one can use the adapted version by using GreaseMonkey.
Sort of, but the Greasemonkey API is completely different from the normal
API, and Greasemonkey doesn't guarantee to stop the execution of existing
JavaScript, so all JavaScript would have to be converted, something overly
burdensome that no one can realistically do.
At best, user scripts can make some JavaScript dependent websites work (like
ViewTube on YouTube). Only on Firefox, though; I haven't seen any other
browser where user scripts work if you disable normal JavaScript execution.
> One other alternative, that needs to be implemented by the site
> developer, is to make a site not load any JavaScript, and instead, ask
> the users to download a GreaseMonkey script instead.
Yes, that would be perfectly acceptable. But it's never going to happen that
way. It would be much easier to just make the website not require JavaScript
in the first place.
