For the live image, go with GNOME Shell; it works and is accessible; I just
don't like all that overhead. If you can get speech and braille into the net
install, as Debian has done, and offer all the desktops, with whatever
accessibility they support, I think everyone's covered.
- [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 blade . vp2020
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 dahunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux... blade . vp2020
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 dahunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 blade . vp2020
- [Trisquel-users] Re : suggestions to uruk gnu/linu... pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/l... blade . vp2020
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 dahunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.0 dahunt
- [Trisquel-users] Re : suggestions to uruk gnu/linux 2.... pinmaritim
