Actually, freedom is a priority, because the other things are consequences of the absence or presence of it.
For example: Imagine a scenario where one is to priorize the goal of privacy and uses non-[free/libre] software, in this scenario, there's no privacy since you can't be sure of what the program is doing (this is often the case for non-free JavaScript). In the other side of the example, if it's free/libre software, then society **has the chance** to achieve privacy. The phrase "has the chance" was chosen so as to note that free/libre software **isn't always** suitable for the society's needs, but the essential freedoms allow society to adapt it to their needs over time.
