Mario, I did read it, in fact I've read it twice.

"In 2016, Alina Davis was abusively and unfairly accused of drugs possession."
Abusively? Unfairly? Citation need.

Metamphetamine possession is a crime, my friend. So is driving with a fake license.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/transgender-woman-forced-serve-jail-7385982

Now, the question of the single cell is another pair of shoes. The old motto, which is just that (a meme that applies only to the poor; the rich and powerful are beyond it, they can do whatever they want to, apparently) goes: All are equal before the law. What I mean is, if the law says driving with a fake license is illegal and punishable with x months of detention, then **everyone** doing so should serve time. If the law says possessing metamphetamine is illegal and punishable with x months in jail, then **everyone** getting caught with it should serve that time.

She should have been absolutely given a single cell. Alina should have NOT in any case been placed in a cell with 4 males. That is an indecency, for obvious reasons (I don't need, I hope, to provide explanations on why it is unacceptable) but she SHOULD be in a jail, like **everyone** else who commits illegalities, she should serve the time in accordance to the violation of the legal code.

The intro of your website talks about bigotry and human stupidity, the fear of the diverse etc etc, but that, my friend has nothing to do with "driving with a fake license and possessing meth". You omitted the "fake license". You also throw in one single sentence without providing any citation or proof whatsoever accompanying your claim: "In 2016, Alina Davis was abusively and unfairly accused of drugs possession."

I hate bigotry, and I hate injustice, but I find your website lacking transparency. When you are asking people to help you with donations or with any kind of action you should be absolutely transparent. You are being not, far from it.




Reply via email to