> But with your extension, it would allow all JS indiscriminately, right?
Yes, it would be unconcerned with that.
But I think uBlock Origin does a fine job blocking that stuff, anyway (and in
a way that works better than NoScript), so I don't think it's that big of a
deal.
> The other one would be for pages like Ebay, where one would have to allow
JS for each inner page visited
That's extremely uncommon. In the case of Ebay, it could be solved with a
custom CSS style that prevents that stupid "enable JavaScript" window from
showing up, because most of the site actually works just fine without
JavaScript.
But where it does happen and is unsolved, I see it as a positive, because it
puts pressure (however small) on the website maintainers to stop doing stupid
shit like that.
> and worse, it would be impossible to use since some need to be reloaded and
have JS on before reaching the specific page (the payment one).
It's been a long time since I ordered something from Ebay. Could you explain
what you mean by this? It seems to me that in any case I can think of, it
would just be a matter of pushing the button a couple extra times.
Then again, we've already established that Ebay's design is stupid, so I
wouldn't be surprised if they screwed that one up, too. ;)
