Yes! Although it would be unreasonable to expect perfection in reducing JS
requirements, the amount some sites use is ridiculous. When entire sections
of the page are missing because a web developer somewhere decided on
compulsory accordion-boxes or some other 'design feature', or (even worse)
the enable-JS popup actually prevents a site that would work reasonably
WITHOUT JS from being usable, it shows just how much form is prioritized over
function. It's depressing, to be honest.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Youtube... mcz
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Yo... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Yo... infinityfallen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Youtube... smirnovdmitri29
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Yo... mcz
- [Trisquel-users] Is Javascript (JS) necessary,... J.B. Nicholson
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version o... infinityfallen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Is Javascript (JS) ne... Adonay Felipe Nogueira
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Youtube... infinityfallen
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Youtube... greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] A Liberated Version of Youtube... marioxcc . MT
