*Personally*, I would also rephrase the following: #+BEGIN_QUOTE
[...] The social movement Stallman started -- the Free Software movement -- predates the Open Source developmental philosophy identified by the Open Source Initiative by over a decade, and the GNU GPL encourages something the open source group eschew: software freedom [...] #+END_QUOTE And change it like so: #+BEGIN_QUOTE [...] The social movement Stallman started -- the Free Software movement -- predates the Open Source developmental method identified by the Open Source Initiative by over a decade, and the GNU GPL encourages something the open source group eschew: the essential freedoms of the software, which is prerequisite for software freedom for the entire society [...] #+END_QUOTE At least for me, this naming change from "software freedom" to "freedom of the software" is important so that people understand that it's not a matter of "being free/libre to use any software or license one wishes to", but a matter of the software having said freedoms, so that the latter matter can be achieved. Also, I don't want to discredit your arguments, because I agree entirely with your arguments, but just for the fun of it: I have changed "Open Source developmental philosophy" to "Open Source developmental method" because I don't believe that open source is a philosophy, because it doesn't question what is moral and ethical or not, contrary to what the free/libre software movement does, see [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/google-engineering-talk.html]] and [[https://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html]]. Besides, the open source development method itself choose not to question these matters right from the start when they decided to change their approach towards the general public, see [[https://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html]] and [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html]].
