Why do you write that Uruk 2.0 is unsuitable for computers with 2GB of RAM
after showing that it uses less than 600MB?
- [Trisquel-users] Re : uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 pinmaritim
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 dahunt
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 pablo96es
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sknc1982
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 dahunt
- [Trisquel-users] Re : uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 greatgnu
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- [Trisquel-users] Re : uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 megver83
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 hd-scania
