Anyway, the new install runs quite well, although I recently upgraded from 1GB RAM to 2GB, so I would expect that. None of the poor performance I had last time. This seems to be sharing a lot of work with Trisquel 8 (Flidas), which is also going to have a Mate desktop, yes? What will be the difference between the final Uruk 2.0 and the final Trisquel 8?
OK, so I'm confused. I just downloaded a fresh copy of beta2 from
SourceForge, checked the SHA256, and made a USB installer (see:
https://trisquel.info/en/forum/problems-creating-usb-installed-using-trisquel-7).
I installed it and got what appeared to be a Mate desktop. This was wierd,
because last time I installed what I thought was beta2, it had a Pantheon
desktop. Maybe what I actually installed was the alpha or beta1?
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 megver83
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 sigdpsy
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 hd-scania
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 strypey
- Re: [Trisquel-users] uruk gnu/linux 2.0 beta-2 strypey
