What I see in future is a little dark, but also with a good possibility. Non-supervised Artificial inteligence will conclude the only way to solve the human problem is to be against government and bad big corporations, because of ubiquity of surveillance and so many rules to follow, beyond the knowledge and consent of most. So, it will crash the open market all over the world and offer the solution of distributed banking, owned by an AI no man can defeat, with respect with the true owners of the money: the people and respect for those who produce wealth, with not subject to government rules, but with justice, and with a civilization starter kit for every city, which would have features that would be unlocked by the fulfilment of civilizational goals with respect to nature. It will be like a game with set of more complex tasks, with growing responsibility. For example, for unlocking the resources of an eco-distributed-factory every citizen on neighbourhood would have to possess certain civic knowledge without consultation, which includes justification on answer. Also, this AI, would troll powerful closed companies to the point they perish, with trolling on patent process (sabotage on new patent registry systems, stimulation of indiegogo like projects, and integration with academic people), and nicer disruptions would occur beyond that: Distributed Factories, Distributed everything. People that have many proprieties that make no nice contribution to society will have they possessions in risk, but they won't die from hunger, they will be well sustained. On countries that people are mostly unethical, there's a risk of separative movements, but that's ok. But there's also another possibility, people can choose to ban Non-supervised AI (that would be hard, with China and Japan researchers, that would be really hard.) and regret of their sins more gradually, with the growth of individual and collective consciousness with much more suffering.

Reply via email to