> If there are things "(being) made of nonsense" or "not (being) made of
sense", then I am sadly unsure which prepositions are proper.
I don't have time to tell you how to write properly. You need to find a tutor
who is fluent in both Cantonese (your native language) and English. I'm only
trying to make you see how bad your English is and how much you're
misunderstanding because of it.
> I clearly understand what are problematic in the Debian's "contrib" pools,
but you should be unclear what my "nonfree integrations" are, and yes this of
course includes the nonfree deps which we all dislike them.
I'm not convinced you understand, because it's a simple issue that you are
making sound complex.
> "pacman" actually stands for Arch itself and its all nonfree forks
That's not something you're supposed to do. Only Arch users know what pacman
is. It's not even named after Arch; it's named based on the fact that it's a
package manager.
> Ubuntu's Amazon backdoors are sure to be old news and are no longer
triggered, but no people are sure if Ubuntu no longer uses any other
backdoors.
Everything in this sentence is wrong. You don't understand what a backdoor
is, don't understand what it means to "trigger" malware, and don't understand
the libre software defense against malware.
> "Linux-nonfree" is just to emphasize the nonfree Linux kernel is nonfree.
It improperly suggests that Linux is generally speaking nonfree. It is not.
What you are actually talking about is mainline Linux.
> DFSG surely doesn't censor but isn't mentioned in my preview docs.
Sorry, my mistake. I meant GNU FSDG. But the presence of the word "GNU"
(which is highly disjointed; DFSG has nothing whatsoever to do with GNU)
should have alerted you to the fact that it was a typo.
> Any minor mistakes thanks feeding back to me.
No, these are not minor mistakes. These are major mistakes, which are causing
what you are writing to be confusing and causing you yourself to
misunderstand the issues. You need a lot of English tutoring.
