[Trisquel-users] Re : RMS, the free software community and cognitive dissonance

[lcerf]

It's not that running nonfree games is acceptable, it's that games don't  
typically require the degree of compatibility other software requires.

What do you mean?  Free software is not about compatibility.  The FSF or RMS  
would certainly argue that the software part (not the graphics, the sounds,  
the story, etc.) of a video game must be free software to be ethical.  A  
specific point is that malware can be (and often is, e.g., DRM) implemented  
in video games.