Of course it is. The opposite would mean DRM! But FSF-endorsed distributions do not steer users towards nonfree software. Here is the whole paragraph in the FSDG:

A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so. The system should have no repositories for nonfree software and no specific recipes for installation of particular nonfree programs. Nor should the distribution refer to third-party repositories that are not committed to only including free software; even if they only have free software today, that may not be true tomorrow. Programs in the system should not suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so on.

Debian does not qualify because it does not respect those guidelines. However ADFENO affirms that "even Debian's "main" repository has some GNU FSDG issues".

Reply via email to