> Sorry. I already deleted Gnome after testing the snap plugin (and > subsequently re-installed MATE).
No worries. Thanks for testing as much as you did. I'd have done it myself, but sadly virtualizion is the one thing I've run into where my 2GB RAM is not enough. > Again, I agree that we need a graphical frontend for software center. But > Gnome Software isn't a solution (in its current form). It is spreading > misconceptions and confusion. It even spreads non-free software if the > plugins and the system's software sources are incorrectly configured. I agree. Like that of Ubuntu Software Center did, the design of GNOME Software seems to present the repository as a "store". This already is confusing for beginners who are not used to how packaging works in a GNU/Linux distribution but are used the Micro$oft Store, crApple Store, or Screwgle Play. It gets even more confusing when software from the Snap Store is mixed in with software that has been packaged by the maintainers. The malicious, proprietary version of 2048 I linked to in my last comment could easily be confused with the free version in the Ubuntu and Trisquel repositories.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
