Well, I believe Pale Moon's trademark policy goes even farther than
Mozilla"s:
5. The binaries are not supplied or built as an integral part of a
commercial/non-commercial software package/larger works ("package"). (...)
6. The binaries are not supplied or built as an integral part of a
commercial/non-commercial website/web service/on-line venue/etc. ("service").
(...)
https://www.palemoon.org/redist.shtml
That said, Mozilla's trademark forbidding to charge for the redistribution of
exact copies (also in Pale Moon's trademark policy) is enough to be
inadmissible: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/foundation/trademarks/policy/
