> It's only a freedom issue if someone uses the JavaScript engine in > Abrowser to run non-free JavaScript.
> No, because those organizations don't have problems with us using their > trademarks to indicate use of their search engine. Maybe these things aren't a problem on their own, but I think that they may constitute a problem together. Since Abrowser is configured to execute all JavaScript by default, Ebay, Amazon, and even DuckDuckGo execute proprietary JavaScript when used in Abrowser. By suggesting these search engines, Abrowser guides the user toward proprietary JavaScript. I think that if Abrowser is not going to block non-free JS by default as Icecat does, it should not go out of it's way to direct users to pages that have non-free JS. https://trisquel.info/en/issues/24453
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
