No. The command should be:$ tr -sc 0-9\\n ' ' < hostname_list | awk '{ k = 0; for (i = 0; k < 4 && ++i file | command2 file As a consequence, it is possible that "file" does not even exist when 'command2' tries to read it. 'command2' would then end with an error.
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to r... amenex
- [Trisquel-users] Re : How can one capture the "Failed to ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
- [Trisquel-users] Re : How can one capture the "Failed to resol... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
- Re: [Trisquel-users] How can one capture the "Failed to resolv... amenex
