RMS perfectly understands what the BSD world calls a "blob" and
https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html explains:
FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining nonfree
programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels include nonfree
firmware blobs.
Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called
“blobs”, and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance, the term
“blob” means something else: a nonfree driver. OpenBSD and perhaps other
BSD distributions (called “projects” by BSD developers) have the policy
of not including those. That is the right policy, as regards drivers; but
when the developers say these distributions “contain no blobs”, it causes
a misunderstanding. They are not talking about firmware blobs.
None of those BSD distributions has policies against proprietary binary-only
firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers.
- [Trisquel-users] Things we already knew but the rest of th... Ignacio Agulló
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Things we already knew but the r... jason
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Things we already knew but t... calmstorm
- [Trisquel-users] Re : Things we already knew ... lcerf
- Re: [Trisquel-users] Things we already knew but the r... andyprough
