> "using the Linux-libre kernel and using Canonical-supported free and open-source software repositories that does not contain non-free packages and closed programs"

> Excluding programs is not the only thing. Some need modification, not outright banning.

Purism doesn't make these modifications and the FSF endorsed their distro anyway. PureOS doesn't even use Linux-libre. Why should Uruk be held to a different standard?

Reply via email to