************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
From: Pete McLaughlin [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 3:30 PM To: Pru Joy Subject: RE: [TROM1] LRH's "failure"? PruJoy I can only give a partial answer to this as I have only read a little about GPM processing. In Scientology the method of finding the GPM involves listing for hot items. A series of questions are asked of the preclear and his many answers are listed, which is to say repeated back to the PC while noting meter reads. The hot items are then further audited. This method fails to recognize that there is a logical formula to the creation of GPMs that will get a complete recover of any hot conflict on a subject. The level 5 chart is this formula. When the chart is used to find ALL the hot items on the subject there will be nothing left to leave the PC aberrated on the subject. By failing to find this logical analytical basis of the GPM Scientology leaves the PC aberrated. They will get relief in the areas they find by the hit or miss method but the areas they miss will come back to haunt the PC. (If anyone has more auditing training on GPM or finds an error in the above do let us know) Keep on TROMming -----Original Message----- From: Pru Joy [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 2:53 PM To: The Resolution of Mind list Subject: Re: [TROM1] LRH's "failure"? Thanks for that Pete - yep, I am now 100% on understanding how postulates work esp. as per TROM. However - I do not understand, or know, why Dennis said that "Ron failed" by looking for the remedy to "gpm's" in the Reactive bank & that he, Dennis, found the solution by using the analytical mind. This point has got me stopped at the moment & so I would appreciate any clarification. (I seem to be going v. slowly, step-wise, onto Level 5, don't I.) PJ
<<attachment: image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
