************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
Dear David you are most welcome.
Keep on TROMing Pete --- On Sun, 4/3/11, David M. Pelly <[email protected]> wrote: From: David M. Pelly <[email protected]> Subject: [TROM1] FW: Basic Basic on a chain of Postulates To: "TROM List" <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, April 3, 2011, 1:14 PM ************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [TROM1] Basic Basic on a chain of Postulates Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:11:07 -0400 #yiv1935015592 .yiv1935015592ExternalClass .yiv1935015592ecxhmmessage P {padding:0px;} #yiv1935015592 .yiv1935015592ExternalClass body.yiv1935015592ecxhmmessage {font-size:10pt;font-family:Tahoma;} Pete, I was just in part, discussing the issue, the problem, Homer talks about in the article you posted last night, with someone I am co auditing with. We both had run into this phenomena in similar or related ways, but had not nailed it down, clearly. Then I checked my mail and I saw your letter and it appears to explain the matter. I was getting restims , pictures, somatics and postulates popping up into view as I was reading it. Thanks for posting it. David Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2011 17:07:50 -0700 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [TROM1] Basic Basic on a chain of Postulates ************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************ I was reading the Ghost Danse articles again when i hit this one by Homer Smith.� i realized he is talking about auditing back chains of postulates which is what TROM does.� Very interesting. keep on TROMing Pete BASIC BASIC ON THE CHAIN OF CHAINS ACT - 23 10 October 1993 Copyright (C) 1993 Homer Wilson Smith Redistribution rights granted for non commercial purposes. It has been the common experience of auditors to find some really great process to run on themselves or their pcs only to find that after a few hours the process grinds to a halt and the pc is left feeling just as bad as before. Take for example the process, 'Tell me about coming in.' 'Do you have a missed withhold on coming in?' Now it sounds logical, doesn't it, the pc had to come into any situation prior to being stuck in it, and so in trying to get him earlier on the chain of that subject you of course would try to get him to contact his responsibility for getting into it in the first place. So I was running this the other day, with great gain, I was nailing the withhold over and over again releasing lots and lots of pain out of my spine, and behind my heart, and the back of my throat, and behind my eyes, and I finally left off on a rather large release that I hoped would continue for a while An hour later I was totally caved in again, in serious pain with somatics all over my body and in my throat. Finally I decided I had better go back into session and deal with it, saying to myself 'I don't want to be here, I REALLY don't want to be here, Jesus H. Christ why do I have to go through all this damn auditing nonsense, why can't I just die in peace and be done with it.' So I went into session grumbling to myself, 'I don't want to be here, I don't want to be here' kind of dragging myself into my case once again in a long line of once agains, hoping that maybe this time I would nail it for good. Well I started running 'I don't want to be here'. And boy was that true. It finally became, 'Tell me about not wanting to be here.' 'Do you have a withhold on not wanting to be here?' 'Do you have -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
