************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
"If A then B" is the basic bonding postulate, as I'm listening to Dennis' tape re "Bonding" and the subject of relationships.
Can this be used to explain the seeming fixed relationship -- i.e., chains -- of (relatd) engrammic material? For example, in shock processing using R3X methods, I discovered that huge chunks of related engrammic material would easily slough off once one contacted the basic-basic (postulate set), which occurred after layers of charge that made it previously unaccesible were peeled away. I recently went to basic-basic and won an expanded VP and am mopping the floor of (mostly) incidental material. My reach is now for resolving relationships, and my mind is certainly obliging me. One of the best ideas Dennis had -- go complementary with the mind. colleen
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
