*************
The following message is relayed to you by  [email protected]
************
Hi Pete

 

Thanks for sharing. Although, from my viewpoint, a word of warning. 

 

Quote from the mentioned article #7: 

The most obvious starting point is to take a list of individuals 
that are perceived as troublesome or hostile to the person. 

End of quote. 

 

In one of the tapes (I don't remember which one) Dennis states, that the 

one question you must not ask the PC, is "who or what is opposing you". 

He says, this is the question, that is going to kill the PC. It was the trap


Ron Hubbard fell into, because (still quoiting Dennis) the opposer is a
logical 

construct and is not found in the bank of the PC. 

 

Kill the PC a bit of an exaggeration? I did Irene Mumford's "Dianasis" some 

10 years ago. (Mrs. Mumford had thought, Hubbard should not have let go 

GPM processing and she devised her own tech). Dianasis was based on the 

question "who or what is opposing..." I ran it for hundreds of hours. My
life 

failed, my case continuously worsened, my body reacted so violently, that 

I got hurt in session (contusion in the jaw joint - if I translate it
correctly - 

not completely healed till today). I recover slowly with TROM now. 

 

In my understanding: 

"The most obvious starting point is to take a list of individuals 
that are perceived as troublesome or hostile to the person" 

clearly is the "who or what is opposing you"-question. 

 

In all TROM data I read and listened to, I didn't find anything that
contradicts 

logic or my own experiences or observations. I couldn't say that of any 

other therapy or method that I tried or read about.

 

thanks and all the best 

Roberto

 

 

 

Von: Pete McLaughlin [mailto:[email protected]] 
Gesendet: Samstag, 18. Februar 2012 02:41
An: TROM
Betreff: [TROM1] tidbits from DEEP Processing

 

here is a piece of article #7 at the DEEP site.

Very interesting

Pete

 

 

There are different entrances into DEEP Character Clearing. Each way of
entering can be organized into a rundown. At this time, one uses the
approach that is most appropriate to what the person offers as the  main
issue. The most obvious starting point is to take a list of individuals that
are perceived as troublesome or hostile to the person. These are in some way
in opposition to the person (or perceived to be) and thus make good
processing material as counter-poles. When doing that, the "other side" of
the polarity is often perceived as self in a special capacity or situation.

In addressing this, we address two main stumbling blocks to case progress:

1) We handle any ongoing conflicts with the upsets, problems and guarded
secrets involved (out rudiments.)

2) We handle any ongoing suppression on the case, also known as PTSness, at
its root cause.

The main difference between running this action and other actions of DEEP
Character Clearing is in how you go about getting into the technique.
Therefore there will be some unique steps, mainly at the beginning of an
action, for the different rundowns. 

What is taken up as the first action is individuals in the person's present
time the person has difficulties with, meaning lots of problems, conflicts,
upsets, personality clashes, etc.

This can be expanded to troublesome individuals the person has encountered
earlier in life.
Also, scanning the person's history for old conflicts and major upsets will
reveal much material.

_______________________________________________
Trom mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom

Reply via email to