************* The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] ************
In other words, what you are saying Paul, is, as long as one plays life goals he could be in nirvana.
If you play non life goals, then you create en-nirvana. (I just invented a new word.) Non life goals create ridges, engrams, gpms, loss, failure, pain and suffering. Generally speaking, this is the main theme of all religions. Non life goals are called sin. David > From: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2012 07:19:48 -0700 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [TROM1] Trom Digest, Vol 96, Issue 31 > > ************* > The following message is relayed to you by [email protected] > ************ > > On Jul 16, 2012, at 5:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Nirvana could be 'permanent' for as long as the being wished. If it > > is not > > maintainable then clearly there is still work to be done. > > > Referring back to Dennis, maintaining Nirvana is not directly > something one can do by wishing. One must ... "adopt complementary > postulates with the whole universe". Which also means that for one > to maintain Nirvana, one must always be creating "complementary > postulates with the whole universe" at all times. > > > Do you mean you ran be, do and have as junior goals packages? > > > Yes. Each of the three have their own Postulate Failure Chart. > > > Brian > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Paul Tipon [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2012 3:40 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: [TROM1] Level 5 & Nirvana > > > > This past week I had some interesting events happen. It really got > > my interest up and going. It made me re-read Level 5 and I also > > subsequently ran the Postulate Chart of Know again. Most notable was > > the 'lots of yawns' with the RI. > > > > One interesting thing that occurred is that I ran into Dennis giving > > a description of Nirvana in the context of how it comes about. Like > > I said it is not a place and not necessarily a beingness in the true > > sense of beingness. As I described in the context of a 'Win' it is > > something that one achieves by their actions. From this then, it is > > also not permanent for as Dennis describes it ... you achieve it by > > doing the following. > > > > Dennis, "A being achieves Nirvana when he can adopt complementary > > postulates with the whole universe. Then, and only then, can he > > leave the universe and go in search of new pastures. Until that > > point is reached, the being is always to some degree trapped in the > > universe. > > The route out is from the compulsive playing of games, through [to] > > the voluntary playing of games, to an ending of all games by the > > adoption of complementary postulates and so the achieving of a non > > game situation: Nirvana." > > > > (my emphasis with the underline and the [to]) > > > > Myself, I also wish to emphasize that one comes out of "the > > compulsive playing of games" by exercising their free-will and know > > that is what they are exercising and that there is no compulsion or > > hint of 'must do ...' anywhere involved with one's choice. Free-Will. > > > > Also of interest is that LRH's Be-Do-Have which I have put into a > > Postulate Chart is also what can keep one in the physical universe > > when one is compulsively postulating those. > > > > Paul/Level 5 in progress > _______________________________________________ > Trom mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
_______________________________________________ Trom mailing list [email protected] http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
